Tag Archives: Gay

Milo Yiannopoulos, pedophilia and gay culture.

22 Feb

milo

Today I want to write about a touchy subject matter… again. Its about Milo Yiannopoulos´ statement on the drunken peasants podcast where he is being accused of defending pedophilia.

My views on Milo Yiannopoulos

Just before this scandal emerged I found out that I was tired of Milo Yiannopoulos. I was tired of him as a character and I was also tired of him being used as a concervative shield. The “we can´t be racist, homophobic or anti-semetic cuz we like Milo Yiannopoulos and he is a gay jew who just have sex with black guys”. I dont know how many times I heard that. I am so tired of hearing about Milo Yiannopoulos´active sexlife and what he does and likes to do. If he truly were concervative he would agree that that is a PRIVATE thing and not something to rub into other people´s faces.

I liked Milo Yiannopoulos when he started to become famous. He wrote some interesting pieces in defence of GamerGate and he was fresh air in the debate. But after some years I have grown really tired of him as he grew more and more flamboyant, more and more “outrageous” as a fighter for freedom of expression. I am myself a lover of freedom of expression, but that doesnt mean I think its taktfull or wise to run off with ones mouth over and over again. I found myself wishing that Milo Yiannopoulos would tone down his demeanor and go back to a more serious behavior as he originally was. Perhaps that may be the one good thing to come out of this, that he may tone down is blabbering mouth a bit in the future. You are no Oscar Wild, Milo.

What did Milo Yiannopoulos say and what did he mean

So the scandal came from some “free thinking” on the Drunken Peasants Podcast Episode 193 “aired” Jan 4, 2016. I dont listen to Drunken Peasants Podcast or anything else the AngryAtheist puts out, but when this scandal came out I did know that Milo had said what he said a long time ago. It was another one of the vulgarities I have become so tired of. “Oh, Milo. What a provocateur. How are you a christian concervative again?”

The subject that was addressed on the Drunken Peasants Podcast was child pornography, pedophilia and child sexual abuse. The setting of the Drunken Peasants Podcast is to spew out provocative nonsense to offend people who are easily offended. Its a childish show, just as most of what the AngryAtheist makes. This setting may have been the reason why Milo decided to be “outrageous” again. Here is what he said that seem to provoke people a year later.

He talked about his own sexual experience of having sex with an older man at the age of 13.
“I would say in the situation I describe on the Joe Rogan show, I was definitely the predator in both occasions, as offensive as people may find that. I dont much care. That was certainly my experience of it.” He also jokes “I’m grateful for father Micheal. I would not give as such as good head if it weren’t for him.”

The problem with this talk is that he is running of with his mouth and cant keep it clear if he is talking about his own experience or sexual molestation in general. But it does seem from later statements that that was his intent. To speak from his experience and not draw some liberal view on the matter. He also wants to distinct between sex between pre-pubescent children and pubescent teens. From the strict definition of pedophilia he is right. Wikipedia says: “Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.” You are not a pedophile if you molest someone after they have reached puberty and have become sexually mature. But he says it with little tact and it can be disturbing to listen to. Not seem to acknowledge the mental maturity that is also relevant to the AGE of CONCENT debate. He does, though, make it clear that he thinks the AGE of CONCENT is “just about right” and that the german AGE of CONCENT which is 14 is a bit low.

The lost context of the gay subculture

When I was young there was a show aired on Norwegian state channel NRK called Queer as Folk (UK-1999). I have seen about two episodes of that show, and one of them was the pilot episode. In the pilot episode we are introduced to three characters. From Wikipedia “The main characters are Stuart Allen Jones (Aidan Gillen), who is highly sexually active, and successfully so. His long-time friend Vince Tyler (Craig Kelly), who has a crush on Stuart, has less luck regarding men. 15-year-old Nathan Maloney (Charlie Hunnam) is new to the gay scene but is not lacking in self-confidence.”.

The still from the sex scene between older man and someone below the british standar of Age of Consent.

The still from the sex scene between older man and someone below the british standar of Age of Consent.

In the first episode we witness Nathan, the 15 year old, have sex with Stuart. This is below the age of consent in the UK, where this show was made. It is also illegal in Norway where I saw the episode on Norwegian television. From what I gather, this is never brought up as something bad and there are noe legal consequences for Stuart having sex with this 15 year old. There was not much debate after the show was aired either if this portrayal was okay or not.

Its kind of difficult to talk about this without understanding that gay subculture have a long history with sexual promiscuity, sexual exploration and sexual hedonism. Causal drug use, bending of ones own and others sexual limits and even braking the age of consent is not uncommon in the gay subculture. One usually laughs when a “christian concervative” says that accepting homosexuality may lead to accepting other more destructive sexual behavior. i.e Pedophilia. But those who laugh dont understand that in the gay subculture there is a lot of grey areas. More than 50. If you want to know more you can google search things like “daddy and son” and “twink”. You will see that there is a lot of this.

Do I stand with Milo?

So do I stand with Milo? Yes, I do. If I understood everything correct his opinion is that 1) pedophila is to be attracted to pre-pubesant children, 2) that not everyone who have sexual encounters below the arbitrary age of consent will feel abused, 3) he supports the age of consent (although not sure if its the UK or US standard, but at least not the german one). If this is his stand then he is NOT an advocate for pedophila. He may have been provocative, but mostly from a hetrosexual and US point of view. I am sure that the LGBTQ will not support him for saying this, but they do know that what he said is very common in the gay subculture. If that is okay or not we need to have a DEBATE about, but that debate can NOT be had if one is suppose to crucify anyone who talks about it.

I wish Milo Yiannopoulos would tone down his character a bit. I think he may say many interessting things, but sometimes, like now, he said something that was not tactful. He also said he was sorry, which means he will be dead by dawn. But yes, I think I understood what he meant, but I had to try to understand it. Not everyone will have that attitude. I think Milo Yiannopoulos have spooken from a gay European perspective and the US do have some serious issues with talking about certain things that we in Europe, for better or worse, talk more freely about. Also I think Milo Yiannopoulos should ask himself if he truly is a concervative. Often he says stuff that does not ring concervative at all.

Blog 2.0 - BOOM! I may have blown up in my face.

Blog 2.0 – BOOM! I may have blown up in my face.

HOW TO MAKE A RESPONSE VIDEO – A response video

1 Aug

Here is my latest experiment in youtube videos. Did I fail?


………………………………

Probably!

Blog 2.0 - Cute and canny

Blog 2.0 – Cute and canny

Me being PC. Almost full SJW.

23 Jun

Sooo…

I am a Christian Concervative and I hate SJW and Political correctness. Then I watched a video that made me almost go full SJW. Here is the ressult.

 

 

Bruised ring

Blog 2.0 – May be working for the devil.

 

Doc Dee N Me Talk About Movies & TV– Part 06: Gay Movies

26 Sep

In this video we talk about gay themed movies. We didnt mention Brokeback mountain. Isnt that funny?

Blog 2.0 - Hello... This is AndyAce83 and I hate PC gaming.

Blog 2.0 – Hello, sailor!

Let´s Play Portal 2 – Episode sin²(θ)+cos²(θ)=1

9 Nov

Here we go again…

In this first Let´s play of Portal 2 multiplayer, Random and Andy try to do some team building, learn a bit about themselves and each other while trying to make learning fun.

Also there is some references to the Hunger Games.

Also I made a intro referring to AngryJoe´s and other creative people on youtube´s copyright problems.

AngryJoe´s videos:
Part 1: http://youtu.be/JQfHdasuWtI
Part 2: http://youtu.be/QAi81_uvztM
Part 3: http://youtu.be/xkFEDQaVxrE

I am using South Park soundbites from the episode “Canada on Strike” for parody use and Apoptygma Berzerk – Kathy’s Song (Ferry Corsten 12”) as pastiche.

Blog 2.0 - This was a triumph

Blog 2.0 – This was a triumph

Hot n Cold

28 Sep

I change my mind
Like a girl changes clothes
Yeah me, PMS
Like a bitch
You would know

And I over think
Always speak
Critically

You should know
That I´m no good for you

[CHORUS]
Cause I´m hot then I´m cold.
I´m yes then I´m no.
I´m in then I´m out.
I´m up then I´m down.
I´m wrong when it’s right.
It’s black and it’s white.
We fight, we break up.
We kiss, we make up.
(I) I don’t really want to stay, no
(but I) But I don’t really want to go-o

Cause I´m hot then I´m cold.
I´m yes then I´m no.
I´m in then I´m out.
I´m up then I´m down.

We used to be
Just like twins
So in sync
The same energy
Now’s a dead battery
Used to laugh bout nothing
Now I´m plain boring

You should know that
I´m not gonna change

[CHORUS]

Someone call the doctor
Got a case of a love bi-polar
Stuck on a roller coaster
Can’t get off this ride

I change my mind
Like a girl changes clothes

[CHORUS 2:]
Cause I´m hot then I´m cold.
I´m yes then I´m no.
I´m in then I´m out.
I´m up then I´m down.
I´m wrong when it’s right.
It’s black and it’s white.
We fight, we break up.
We kiss, we make up.
(I) I don’t really want to stay, no
(but I) But I don’t really want to go-o

Blog 2.0 -has always said ``It takes a genius to find the brilliance in a stupid pop song´´ but is apt to change it´s mind.

PS: This was AMC´s blog entry #100. It sort of explains everything don´t you think? Sort of like the last episode of Twin Peaks. “Oh, yeah. That was the meaning behind the backwards talking dwarf… sorry midget… sorry… little person. I understand completely everything now.” And the post series movie “fire walk with me“. Talk about feeding us with a spoon. Yeah we get it! “I AM the muffin.”, sure. “It was a dream! We live inside a dream!“, no doubt! “Bob, I want all my Garmonbozia.WE GET IT!

I’m a freethinker, but are you? (A check list)

17 Jul

We all know that we are freethinkers and we have the internet to prove it. But sometimes we fear that we may not be freethinkers enough. It is a constant battle to be a individual with strong, concious opinions, so we have to read other peoples blogs that can confirm our knowledge. “Yes“, we think “Ain’t that the truth!” and we feel at ease again. Knowing that we know.

''Am I really thinking freely enough?'', our anxious minds sometimes think. I blame religion!

Unfortunately our animal self has a dark side that it needs to return to, and our self-consciousness becomes clear and aware again. So sometimes we look into the mirror and think; “Am I really the freethinker I think I am?“.

But now you don’t have to fear any more that you are less of a freethinker than anyone else at the party. Now you can say loudly and proudly “I am a freethinker cuz I took a test!” (and of course add where you found it and what clever insightful internet page it was). For free, as all freethinking should be, I give thee a check-list.

————————————-

Click on the image to get a greater size.

RESSULTS:

All “yes”: You are the essence of a freethinker and the central for real knowledge and truth.

Most “yes”: You are nodoubt a freethinker but you have to read some more books by other freethinkers and watch some stand-up comedy about how stupid some people are (i.e George Carlin or Penn Jillette) and remember keep feeling smug.

Most “No”: *Sigh* You are a conservative who probably believes in a talking dead guy in the sky. How stupid are you? Lol! But seriously, I hope you die!

All “No”: Fuck you! I will abort my fetuses as much as I want! I will sodomize who I want. I will do what I want and don’t you JUDGE ME!

Most “Idunno”: It’s okay as long as you keep your mouth shut and don’t ask any questions.

All “Idunno”: Who’s this retard?

Blog 2.0 - Freethink is the future and I wear my sunglasses @ night!

Musing on music while thinking of the gay’s days

30 May

80’s music…
Very gay. It makes me think; was it just fashion or was it something more gayish under? To rephrase; did the artist back then just seem gay or where they in those days?

We all know that Boy George liked to be happy and gay. Later George Michael turned out the same way. Michael Jackson was also probably a knight of the ass, but not the PC kind. Morrissey is still unclear… if you want to, but… lets be honest…

Anyway this is Tear for Queers.

The video is basically an effeminate guy sitting in the living room looking sad and touching window while his friend (and co-artist) dances karate dance in the garden. Very gay. But fashionably gay or just regularly gay? And why do I care?

Well, it’s all about the history of suppression. How, where and who decides where, how and who gets suppressed? If an entire decade (perhaps two, if you count the 70’s) was dedicated to gayness (just not explicitly) then how can someone portray gay people as suppressed? Is it about the explicit? Is it about the rights to rights? Is one only thoroughly liberated when everybody accepts, condones and applauds ones actions? Do one have to be explicitly gay to liberate homosexuality? To me, it’s gay enough to touch windows. More windows touching and less parading please.

Blog 2.0

Blog 2.0 - Sometimes Blog 2.0 touches windows too.

(Blog update 30th of june 2010: So I was making fun of MJ in this blog. Hinting at his rumours of being a… you know. There have been a lot of rumours about this strange alien creature like 1) he being white because of plastic surgery not pigment decease and 2) his children not being his.

Now since I am a cynical whore I believe every bad thing said about every person on earth. So I read a gossip magazine a couple of days ago and there where (pa-pa) paparazzi pictures of his children where one of the children had a pigment decease. WOW! And suddenly I saw that the youngest child looked like MJ too. His children proved me wrong.

So although I am a cynical bastard I still believe I have the ability to admit wrong doings and I will do this now. If I am wrong about MJ’s plastic surgery (he has had it but not to become white) and his children being not his… Then I can be wrong about his other things to.

His children proved me wrong“. Sort of pleasing and nice isn’t it? I guess my prescription is kicking in.)

HOW HOMOPHOBIC ARE YOU???????????? (“I could have been wilde, I could have been free.”)

22 Oct

The test: How long can you watch this video before you get repulsed? NB!
You are not allowed to stop the video at any time, if you do that’s when you stopped watching (we can all stand a little gay at a time!)

Result:
0-10 sec: Very homophobic (We are talking “a hater”)
11-30 sec: Homophobic (“No gay marriage”)
3…1-2:00 sec: Neutral (“Gay, what?”)
2:01-3:00 sec: Liberal/meterosexual (“Equal rites”)
3:01-4:30 sec: Fag Hag/Man (“They are a fascinating bunch!”)
4:31-6:00: Wannabegay (“We’re… they’re queer, we’re…they’re here, get used to it!”)
6:01-633: In a danger zone (use condoms!)
6:34 (All the way through): YOU ARE GAY. You are the QUEEN OF GAY and that effeminate mans bitch!

(I saw 7 sec. That makes me a man!!! I fix cars. Not afraid of being dirty and oily. I watch naked pictures of woman and objectify them by thinking of fucking them. Hard! I chop lumber! I am a lumberjack!)

This is a "Don't be a cliché" entry. About individuals in a group working hard to confirm our prejudice.